Laksmanasena - Revision history

Mukbil at 17:45, 3 August 2021

2021-08-03T17:45:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:45, 3 August 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Laksmanasena''' (c 1178-1206 AD) the third king of the [[sena dynasty]], who ruled for about 28 years. Laksmanasena succeeded his father [[vallalasena]]. The history of his reign can be reconstructed from the epigraphs of his time so far discovered.		'''Laksmanasena''' (c 1178-1206 AD) the third king of the [[Sena Dynasty\|sena dynasty]], who ruled for about 28 years. Laksmanasena succeeded his father [[Vallalasena\|vallalasena]]. The history of his reign can be reconstructed from the epigraphs of his time so far discovered.

	It is evident from the records of his reign that before he came to power he defeated the king of [[gauda]] and Varanasi (Kashi) and made expeditions against [[kamarupa]] and Kalinga. It is quite probable that the above victories were achieved by Laksmanasena in his youth and possibly during the reign of his grand father, [[vijayasena]], who was engaged in warfare against the kings of Gauda, Kalinga, Kamarupa and also most probably against the King of Kasi of the Gahadaval dynasty. It appears from the epigraphs of Laksmanasena that he was the first king among the Senas to assume the title of ''Gaudeshvara''. This title is, however, absent in the plates of both Vijayasena and Vallalasena. From this fact, it has been argued that it was Laksmanasena who finally subdued Gauda and assumed for himself the title of Gaudesvara. But this argument is very weak because there can hardly be any doubt regarding the establishment of the Sena rule over the whole of Bengal during the reign of Vijayasena. The Sena records do not refer to any incident in the intervening period that necessitated the reconquest of Gauda by Laksmanasena. Moreover the occupation of northern Bengal by the Senas during the reigns of Vijayasena and Vallalasena has been proved beyond any doubt.		It is evident from the records of his reign that before he came to power he defeated the king of [[Gauda, Janapada\|gauda]] and Varanasi (Kashi) and made expeditions against [[Kamarupa\|kamarupa]] and Kalinga. It is quite probable that the above victories were achieved by Laksmanasena in his youth and possibly during the reign of his grand father, [[Vijayasena\|vijayasena]], who was engaged in warfare against the kings of Gauda, Kalinga, Kamarupa and also most probably against the King of Kasi of the Gahadaval dynasty. It appears from the epigraphs of Laksmanasena that he was the first king among the Senas to assume the title of ''Gaudeshvara''. This title is, however, absent in the plates of both Vijayasena and Vallalasena. From this fact, it has been argued that it was Laksmanasena who finally subdued Gauda and assumed for himself the title of Gaudesvara. But this argument is very weak because there can hardly be any doubt regarding the establishment of the Sena rule over the whole of Bengal during the reign of Vijayasena. The Sena records do not refer to any incident in the intervening period that necessitated the reconquest of Gauda by Laksmanasena. Moreover the occupation of northern Bengal by the Senas during the reigns of Vijayasena and Vallalasena has been proved beyond any doubt.

	It is recorded in the copper plates of his sons that Laksmanasena built monuments indicating his victory in Puri, Benaras and Allahabad. However it is very difficult to conclude from the high sounding praise in the records of the sons of Laksmanasena that his monuments refer to the expansion of the Sena power over those areas during his reign. His court poets [[umapatidhara]] and Sharana described the expeditions of an anonymous king who conquered [[pragjyotisa]], Gauda, Kalinga, Kashi and Magadha and Cedi and Mlechchharaja. Probably this eulogy can be attributed to Laksmanasena, for all these except Cedi and Mlechchhas. It is evident from an inscription (Akaltara inscription) that Vallabharaja, a feudatory of the Kalachuri (Cedi) king of Ratnapura defeated the king of Gauda. On the other hand, Laksmanasena claimed victory over him. Although the conflict between the two is more or less certain, the result is not.		It is recorded in the copper plates of his sons that Laksmanasena built monuments indicating his victory in Puri, Benaras and Allahabad. However it is very difficult to conclude from the high sounding praise in the records of the sons of Laksmanasena that his monuments refer to the expansion of the Sena power over those areas during his reign. His court poets [[Umapatidhara\|umapatidhara]] and Sharana described the expeditions of an anonymous king who conquered [[Pragjyotisa\|pragjyotisa]], Gauda, Kalinga, Kashi and Magadha and Cedi and Mlechchharaja. Probably this eulogy can be attributed to Laksmanasena, for all these except Cedi and Mlechchhas. It is evident from an inscription (Akaltara inscription) that Vallabharaja, a feudatory of the Kalachuri (Cedi) king of Ratnapura defeated the king of Gauda. On the other hand, Laksmanasena claimed victory over him. Although the conflict between the two is more or less certain, the result is not.

	There is no doubt that Laksmanasena came to the throne at a fairly old age. His reign was famous for remarkable literary activity. He himself wrote many Sanskrit poems, some of which are preserved in the anthology ''[[saduktikarnamrita]]'', and completed the ''Adbhutasagara'', which was started by his father. His court was an assembly of several renowned poets like Jayadeva, the author of the ''[[gitagovindam]]''; Sarana; Dhoyi, the composer of the ''Pavanaduta'' and probably also Govardhana. His friend Shridharadasa, son of Vatudasa compiled the ''Saduktikarnamrta'', an anthology of Sanskrit verses, during his reign. His chief minister and chief judge was Halayudha Mishra, who wrote the ''Brahmanasarvasva''. Umapatidhara, the author of the [[deopara prashasti]] is referred to have been a minister and one of the several court poets of Laksmanasena.		There is no doubt that Laksmanasena came to the throne at a fairly old age. His reign was famous for remarkable literary activity. He himself wrote many Sanskrit poems, some of which are preserved in the anthology ''[[Saduktikarnamrita\|saduktikarnamrita]]'', and completed the ''Adbhutasagara'', which was started by his father. His court was an assembly of several renowned poets like Jayadeva, the author of the ''[[Gitagovindam\|gitagovindam]]''; Sarana; Dhoyi, the composer of the ''Pavanaduta'' and probably also Govardhana. His friend Shridharadasa, son of Vatudasa compiled the ''Saduktikarnamrta'', an anthology of Sanskrit verses, during his reign. His chief minister and chief judge was Halayudha Mishra, who wrote the ''Brahmanasarvasva''. Umapatidhara, the author of the [[Deopara Prashasti\|deopara prashasti]] is referred to have been a minister and one of the several court poets of Laksmanasena.

	It is known that Laksamanasena was a staunch Vaisnava, while his father and grandfather are known to have been devout Shaiva. He took the title of ''Paramavaisnava'' or ''Paramanarasingha''. Nothing definite is known regarding his change of faith. Laksmanasena was famous for his exceptional qualities and proverbial generosity. Indeed his generosity even attracted the attention of Minhaj-us-Siraj, the author of the ''[[tabaqat-i-nasiri]]'', who designated him as a 'great Rae'; of Bengal and compared him with Sultan Qutbuddin. He, however, became too weak to run the administration of his kingdom towards the close of his reign. During this time there were signs of disruption and disintegration within his kingdom. Contemporary epigraphic records refer to the emergence of a number of independent chiefs in different parts of the Sena kingdom, which paved the way for its decline.		It is known that Laksamanasena was a staunch Vaisnava, while his father and grandfather are known to have been devout Shaiva. He took the title of ''Paramavaisnava'' or ''Paramanarasingha''. Nothing definite is known regarding his change of faith. Laksmanasena was famous for his exceptional qualities and proverbial generosity. Indeed his generosity even attracted the attention of Minhaj-us-Siraj, the author of the ''[[Tabaqat-i-Nasiri\|tabaqat-i-nasiri]]'', who designated him as a 'great Rae' of Bengal and compared him with Sultan Qutbuddin. He, however, became too weak to run the administration of his kingdom towards the close of his reign. During this time there were signs of disruption and disintegration within his kingdom. Contemporary epigraphic records refer to the emergence of a number of independent chiefs in different parts of the Sena kingdom, which paved the way for its decline.

	However, the final blow to the Sena kingdom came from Muhammad [[bakhtiyar khalji]], the Turkish invader. Indeed when the whole of northern India gradually came under the sway of the Muslims it was quite natural that they would try their arms eastward.		However, the final blow to the Sena kingdom came from Muhammad [[Bakhtiyar Khalji\|bakhtiyar khalji]], the Turkish invader. Indeed when the whole of northern India gradually came under the sway of the Muslims it was quite natural that they would try their arms eastward.

	Bakhtyar Khalji first stormed Bihar and then invaded Nadia (in 1205 AD) and compelled Laksmanasena to flee to eastern Bengal. The Turkish invader gradually captured western and northern Bengal and laid the foundation of Muslim rule in Bengal. At that time Laksmanasena was an octogenarian. Hence it is likely that the old king could hardly offer any serious resistance to the invasion. Bakhtyar marched against Bengal with a band of well-trained horsemen. He was at first treated in Nadia as a horse-dealer. The old Sena king, who was then at his dinner, was completely taken by surprise. When Bakhtiyar captured Nadia, Laksmanasena withdrew to southeastern Bengal, where his sons continued the rule of the Senas for some time. His presence in southeastern Bengal is proved by his Bhowal plate, issued in his 27th year to grant land in an area not far away from Dhaka. He died some time in 1206 AD.		Bakhtyar Khalji first stormed Bihar and then invaded Nadia (in 1205 AD) and compelled Laksmanasena to flee to eastern Bengal. The Turkish invader gradually captured western and northern Bengal and laid the foundation of Muslim rule in Bengal. At that time Laksmanasena was an octogenarian. Hence it is likely that the old king could hardly offer any serious resistance to the invasion. Bakhtyar marched against Bengal with a band of well-trained horsemen. He was at first treated in Nadia as a horse-dealer. The old Sena king, who was then at his dinner, was completely taken by surprise. When Bakhtiyar captured Nadia, Laksmanasena withdrew to southeastern Bengal, where his sons continued the rule of the Senas for some time. His presence in southeastern Bengal is proved by his Bhowal plate, issued in his 27th year to grant land in an area not far away from Dhaka. He died some time in 1206 AD.

	At Laksmanasena';s accession the Senas had the paramountcy over the whole of Bengal, and their greatness found expression in the numerous literary works that were produced during his reign. And towards the end of his reign the Sena power declined and the rule of his successors was limited to parts of southeastern Bengal, where emerged other local rulers. [Chitta Ranjan Misra~~] [Misra, Chitta Ranjan Professor of History, Rajshahi University~~]		At Laksmanasena's accession the Senas had the paramountcy over the whole of Bengal, and their greatness found expression in the numerous literary works that were produced during his reign. And towards the end of his reign the Sena power declined and the rule of his successors was limited to parts of southeastern Bengal, where emerged other local rulers. [Chitta Ranjan Misra]

	[[Category:Biography]]		[[Category:Biography]]

	[[bn:~~লক্ষ্ণণসেন~~]]		[[bn:লক্ষ্মণসেন]]

Nasirkhan: Content Updated.

2021-06-18T06:12:36Z

Content Updated.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:12, 18 June 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~<p class=Normal >~~'''Laksmanasena''' (c 1178-1206 AD) the third king of the [[sena dynasty]], who ruled for about 28 years. Laksmanasena succeeded his father [[vallalasena]]. The history of his reign can be reconstructed from the epigraphs of his time so far discovered.		'''Laksmanasena''' (c 1178-1206 AD) the third king of the [[sena dynasty]], who ruled for about 28 years. Laksmanasena succeeded his father [[vallalasena]]. The history of his reign can be reconstructed from the epigraphs of his time so far discovered.

	~~<p class=Normal >~~It is evident from the records of his reign that before he came to power he defeated the king of [[gauda]] and Varanasi (Kashi) and made expeditions against [[kamarupa]] and Kalinga. It is quite probable that the above victories were achieved by Laksmanasena in his youth and possibly during the reign of his grand father, [[vijayasena]], who was engaged in warfare against the kings of Gauda, Kalinga, Kamarupa and also most probably against the King of Kasi of the Gahadaval dynasty. It appears from the epigraphs of Laksmanasena that he was the first king among the Senas to assume the title of ''Gaudeshvara''. This title is, however, absent in the plates of both Vijayasena and Vallalasena. From this fact, it has been argued that it was Laksmanasena who finally subdued Gauda and assumed for himself the title of Gaudesvara. But this argument is very weak because there can hardly be any doubt regarding the establishment of the Sena rule over the whole of Bengal during the reign of Vijayasena. The Sena records do not refer to any incident in the intervening period that necessitated the reconquest of Gauda by Laksmanasena. Moreover the occupation of northern Bengal by the Senas during the reigns of Vijayasena and Vallalasena has been proved beyond any doubt.		It is evident from the records of his reign that before he came to power he defeated the king of [[gauda]] and Varanasi (Kashi) and made expeditions against [[kamarupa]] and Kalinga. It is quite probable that the above victories were achieved by Laksmanasena in his youth and possibly during the reign of his grand father, [[vijayasena]], who was engaged in warfare against the kings of Gauda, Kalinga, Kamarupa and also most probably against the King of Kasi of the Gahadaval dynasty. It appears from the epigraphs of Laksmanasena that he was the first king among the Senas to assume the title of ''Gaudeshvara''. This title is, however, absent in the plates of both Vijayasena and Vallalasena. From this fact, it has been argued that it was Laksmanasena who finally subdued Gauda and assumed for himself the title of Gaudesvara. But this argument is very weak because there can hardly be any doubt regarding the establishment of the Sena rule over the whole of Bengal during the reign of Vijayasena. The Sena records do not refer to any incident in the intervening period that necessitated the reconquest of Gauda by Laksmanasena. Moreover the occupation of northern Bengal by the Senas during the reigns of Vijayasena and Vallalasena has been proved beyond any doubt.

	~~<p class=Normal >~~It is recorded in the copper plates of his sons that Laksmanasena built monuments indicating his victory in Puri, Benaras and Allahabad. However it is very difficult to conclude from the high sounding praise in the records of the sons of Laksmanasena that his monuments refer to the expansion of the Sena power over those areas during his reign. His court poets [[umapatidhara]] and Sharana described the expeditions of an anonymous king who conquered [[pragjyotisa]], Gauda, Kalinga, Kashi and Magadha and Cedi and Mlechchharaja. Probably this eulogy can be attributed to Laksmanasena, for all these except Cedi and Mlechchhas. It is evident from an inscription (Akaltara inscription) that Vallabharaja, a feudatory of the Kalachuri (Cedi) king of Ratnapura defeated the king of Gauda. On the other hand, Laksmanasena claimed victory over him. Although the conflict between the two is more or less certain, the result is not.		It is recorded in the copper plates of his sons that Laksmanasena built monuments indicating his victory in Puri, Benaras and Allahabad. However it is very difficult to conclude from the high sounding praise in the records of the sons of Laksmanasena that his monuments refer to the expansion of the Sena power over those areas during his reign. His court poets [[umapatidhara]] and Sharana described the expeditions of an anonymous king who conquered [[pragjyotisa]], Gauda, Kalinga, Kashi and Magadha and Cedi and Mlechchharaja. Probably this eulogy can be attributed to Laksmanasena, for all these except Cedi and Mlechchhas. It is evident from an inscription (Akaltara inscription) that Vallabharaja, a feudatory of the Kalachuri (Cedi) king of Ratnapura defeated the king of Gauda. On the other hand, Laksmanasena claimed victory over him. Although the conflict between the two is more or less certain, the result is not.

	~~<p class=Normal >~~There is no doubt that Laksmanasena came to the throne at a fairly old age. His reign was famous for remarkable literary activity. He himself wrote many Sanskrit poems, some of which are preserved in the anthology ''[[saduktikarnamrita]]'', and completed the ''Adbhutasagara'', which was started by his father. His court was an assembly of several renowned poets like Jayadeva, the author of the ''[[gitagovindam]]''; Sarana; Dhoyi, the composer of the ''Pavanaduta'' and probably also Govardhana. His friend Shridharadasa, son of Vatudasa compiled the ''Saduktikarnamrta'', an anthology of Sanskrit verses, during his reign. His chief minister and chief judge was Halayudha Mishra, who wrote the ''Brahmanasarvasva''. Umapatidhara, the author of the [[deopara prashasti]] is referred to have been a minister and one of the several court poets of Laksmanasena.		There is no doubt that Laksmanasena came to the throne at a fairly old age. His reign was famous for remarkable literary activity. He himself wrote many Sanskrit poems, some of which are preserved in the anthology ''[[saduktikarnamrita]]'', and completed the ''Adbhutasagara'', which was started by his father. His court was an assembly of several renowned poets like Jayadeva, the author of the ''[[gitagovindam]]''; Sarana; Dhoyi, the composer of the ''Pavanaduta'' and probably also Govardhana. His friend Shridharadasa, son of Vatudasa compiled the ''Saduktikarnamrta'', an anthology of Sanskrit verses, during his reign. His chief minister and chief judge was Halayudha Mishra, who wrote the ''Brahmanasarvasva''. Umapatidhara, the author of the [[deopara prashasti]] is referred to have been a minister and one of the several court poets of Laksmanasena.

	~~<p class=Normal >~~It is known that Laksamanasena was a staunch Vaisnava, while his father and grandfather are known to have been devout Shaiva. He took the title of ''Paramavaisnava'' or ''Paramanarasingha''. Nothing definite is known regarding his change of faith. Laksmanasena was famous for his exceptional qualities and proverbial generosity. Indeed his generosity even attracted the attention of Minhaj-us-Siraj, the author of the ''[[tabaqat-i-nasiri]]'', who designated him as a 'great Rae'; of Bengal and compared him with Sultan Qutbuddin. He, however, became too weak to run the administration of his kingdom towards the close of his reign. During this time there were signs of disruption and disintegration within his kingdom. Contemporary epigraphic records refer to the emergence of a number of independent chiefs in different parts of the Sena kingdom, which paved the way for its decline.		It is known that Laksamanasena was a staunch Vaisnava, while his father and grandfather are known to have been devout Shaiva. He took the title of ''Paramavaisnava'' or ''Paramanarasingha''. Nothing definite is known regarding his change of faith. Laksmanasena was famous for his exceptional qualities and proverbial generosity. Indeed his generosity even attracted the attention of Minhaj-us-Siraj, the author of the ''[[tabaqat-i-nasiri]]'', who designated him as a 'great Rae'; of Bengal and compared him with Sultan Qutbuddin. He, however, became too weak to run the administration of his kingdom towards the close of his reign. During this time there were signs of disruption and disintegration within his kingdom. Contemporary epigraphic records refer to the emergence of a number of independent chiefs in different parts of the Sena kingdom, which paved the way for its decline.

	~~<p class=Normal >~~However, the final blow to the Sena kingdom came from Muhammad [[bakhtiyar khalji]], the Turkish invader. Indeed when the whole of northern India gradually came under the sway of the Muslims it was quite natural that they would try their arms eastward.		However, the final blow to the Sena kingdom came from Muhammad [[bakhtiyar khalji]], the Turkish invader. Indeed when the whole of northern India gradually came under the sway of the Muslims it was quite natural that they would try their arms eastward.

	~~<p class=Normal >~~Bakhtyar Khalji first stormed Bihar and then invaded Nadia (in 1205 AD) and compelled Laksmanasena to flee to eastern Bengal. The Turkish invader gradually captured western and northern Bengal and laid the foundation of Muslim rule in Bengal. At that time Laksmanasena was an octogenarian. Hence it is likely that the old king could hardly offer any serious resistance to the invasion. Bakhtyar marched against Bengal with a band of well-trained horsemen. He was at first treated in Nadia as a horse-dealer. The old Sena king, who was then at his dinner, was completely taken by surprise. When Bakhtiyar captured Nadia, Laksmanasena withdrew to southeastern Bengal, where his sons continued the rule of the Senas for some time. His presence in southeastern Bengal is proved by his Bhowal plate, issued in his 27th year to grant land in an area not far away from Dhaka. He died some time in 1206 AD.		Bakhtyar Khalji first stormed Bihar and then invaded Nadia (in 1205 AD) and compelled Laksmanasena to flee to eastern Bengal. The Turkish invader gradually captured western and northern Bengal and laid the foundation of Muslim rule in Bengal. At that time Laksmanasena was an octogenarian. Hence it is likely that the old king could hardly offer any serious resistance to the invasion. Bakhtyar marched against Bengal with a band of well-trained horsemen. He was at first treated in Nadia as a horse-dealer. The old Sena king, who was then at his dinner, was completely taken by surprise. When Bakhtiyar captured Nadia, Laksmanasena withdrew to southeastern Bengal, where his sons continued the rule of the Senas for some time. His presence in southeastern Bengal is proved by his Bhowal plate, issued in his 27th year to grant land in an area not far away from Dhaka. He died some time in 1206 AD.

	~~<p class=Normal >~~At Laksmanasena';s accession the Senas had the paramountcy over the whole of Bengal, and their greatness found expression in the numerous literary works that were produced during his reign. And towards the end of his reign the Sena power declined and the rule of his successors was limited to parts of southeastern Bengal, where emerged other local rulers. [Chitta Ranjan Misra] [Misra, Chitta Ranjan Professor of History, Rajshahi University]		At Laksmanasena';s accession the Senas had the paramountcy over the whole of Bengal, and their greatness found expression in the numerous literary works that were produced during his reign. And towards the end of his reign the Sena power declined and the rule of his successors was limited to parts of southeastern Bengal, where emerged other local rulers. [Chitta Ranjan Misra] [Misra, Chitta Ranjan Professor of History, Rajshahi University]

	[[Category:Biography]]		[[Category:Biography]]

	[[bn:লক্ষ্ণণসেন]]		[[bn:লক্ষ্ণণসেন]]

0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1: Content Updated.

2021-06-17T19:19:42Z

Content Updated.

New page

'''Laksmanasena''' (c 1178-1206 AD) the third king of the [[sena dynasty]], who ruled for about 28 years. Laksmanasena succeeded his father [[vallalasena]]. The history of his reign can be reconstructed from the epigraphs of his time so far discovered.

It is evident from the records of his reign that before he came to power he defeated the king of [[gauda]] and Varanasi (Kashi) and made expeditions against [[kamarupa]] and Kalinga. It is quite probable that the above victories were achieved by Laksmanasena in his youth and possibly during the reign of his grand father, [[vijayasena]], who was engaged in warfare against the kings of Gauda, Kalinga, Kamarupa and also most probably against the King of Kasi of the Gahadaval dynasty. It appears from the epigraphs of Laksmanasena that he was the first king among the Senas to assume the title of ''Gaudeshvara''. This title is, however, absent in the plates of both Vijayasena and Vallalasena. From this fact, it has been argued that it was Laksmanasena who finally subdued Gauda and assumed for himself the title of Gaudesvara. But this argument is very weak because there can hardly be any doubt regarding the establishment of the Sena rule over the whole of Bengal during the reign of Vijayasena. The Sena records do not refer to any incident in the intervening period that necessitated the reconquest of Gauda by Laksmanasena. Moreover the occupation of northern Bengal by the Senas during the reigns of Vijayasena and Vallalasena has been proved beyond any doubt.

It is recorded in the copper plates of his sons that Laksmanasena built monuments indicating his victory in Puri, Benaras and Allahabad. However it is very difficult to conclude from the high sounding praise in the records of the sons of Laksmanasena that his monuments refer to the expansion of the Sena power over those areas during his reign. His court poets [[umapatidhara]] and Sharana described the expeditions of an anonymous king who conquered [[pragjyotisa]], Gauda, Kalinga, Kashi and Magadha and Cedi and Mlechchharaja. Probably this eulogy can be attributed to Laksmanasena, for all these except Cedi and Mlechchhas. It is evident from an inscription (Akaltara inscription) that Vallabharaja, a feudatory of the Kalachuri (Cedi) king of Ratnapura defeated the king of Gauda. On the other hand, Laksmanasena claimed victory over him. Although the conflict between the two is more or less certain, the result is not.

There is no doubt that Laksmanasena came to the throne at a fairly old age. His reign was famous for remarkable literary activity. He himself wrote many Sanskrit poems, some of which are preserved in the anthology ''[[saduktikarnamrita]]'', and completed the ''Adbhutasagara'', which was started by his father. His court was an assembly of several renowned poets like Jayadeva, the author of the ''[[gitagovindam]]''; Sarana; Dhoyi, the composer of the ''Pavanaduta'' and probably also Govardhana. His friend Shridharadasa, son of Vatudasa compiled the ''Saduktikarnamrta'', an anthology of Sanskrit verses, during his reign. His chief minister and chief judge was Halayudha Mishra, who wrote the ''Brahmanasarvasva''. Umapatidhara, the author of the [[deopara prashasti]] is referred to have been a minister and one of the several court poets of Laksmanasena.

It is known that Laksamanasena was a staunch Vaisnava, while his father and grandfather are known to have been devout Shaiva. He took the title of ''Paramavaisnava'' or ''Paramanarasingha''. Nothing definite is known regarding his change of faith. Laksmanasena was famous for his exceptional qualities and proverbial generosity. Indeed his generosity even attracted the attention of Minhaj-us-Siraj, the author of the ''[[tabaqat-i-nasiri]]'', who designated him as a 'great Rae'; of Bengal and compared him with Sultan Qutbuddin. He, however, became too weak to run the administration of his kingdom towards the close of his reign. During this time there were signs of disruption and disintegration within his kingdom. Contemporary epigraphic records refer to the emergence of a number of independent chiefs in different parts of the Sena kingdom, which paved the way for its decline.

However, the final blow to the Sena kingdom came from Muhammad [[bakhtiyar khalji]], the Turkish invader. Indeed when the whole of northern India gradually came under the sway of the Muslims it was quite natural that they would try their arms eastward.

Bakhtyar Khalji first stormed Bihar and then invaded Nadia (in 1205 AD) and compelled Laksmanasena to flee to eastern Bengal. The Turkish invader gradually captured western and northern Bengal and laid the foundation of Muslim rule in Bengal. At that time Laksmanasena was an octogenarian. Hence it is likely that the old king could hardly offer any serious resistance to the invasion. Bakhtyar marched against Bengal with a band of well-trained horsemen. He was at first treated in Nadia as a horse-dealer. The old Sena king, who was then at his dinner, was completely taken by surprise. When Bakhtiyar captured Nadia, Laksmanasena withdrew to southeastern Bengal, where his sons continued the rule of the Senas for some time. His presence in southeastern Bengal is proved by his Bhowal plate, issued in his 27th year to grant land in an area not far away from Dhaka. He died some time in 1206 AD.

At Laksmanasena';s accession the Senas had the paramountcy over the whole of Bengal, and their greatness found expression in the numerous literary works that were produced during his reign. And towards the end of his reign the Sena power declined and the rule of his successors was limited to parts of southeastern Bengal, where emerged other local rulers. [Chitta Ranjan Misra] [Misra, Chitta Ranjan Professor of History, Rajshahi University]

[[Category:Biography]]

[[bn:লক্ষ্ণণসেন]]